![]() While pedestrian buttons are often treated as a default solution, manual detection is in fact a way of reducing the attractiveness and effectiveness of walking as a mode of transport. ![]() Additional problems may stem from inadequate accessibility of the buttons, the insufficient number or noticeability thereof, or their being situated off the default (shortest) path. While this has been shown to be a false premise in the past, it is particularly unlikely to hold true when the pedestrian sees that parallel traffic streams have a green light while s/he has a red one (due to not pressing a button or pressing it too late). Another assumption is that the pedestrian will wait until the light changes to cross the road, regardless of the situation on the intersection. These include the need for the pedestrian to: identify that the lights need to be activated (which is the case at only selected crossings), find a push button, walk up to it and activate it. Such an assumption (one of several made when installing pedestrian buttons) is false due to a number of factors. that every pedestrian will by default press the button at the moment s/he approaches the crossing. Such an approach can generate a number of problems, especially if the light settings are based on the premise that manual and automatic activation of lights are equally effective, i.e. However, pedestrians are usually left with the rather antiquated method of pressing a button. A wide variety of methods is employed to detect vehicles - from cameras through induction loops to laser radars. detect vehicles and optimize road traffic flow. Traffic lights in urban transport systems are often designed to take into account the situation on the road, i.e. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |